English
العربية
Français
Deutsch
Italiano
فارسی
Español
TürkçeThere is no single best pay-as-you-go prop firm, because the cheapest-looking offer is often not the cheapest route to a funded account. Rather than rank firms, this article gives you a method for comparing any offer on its total cost, and a checklist to apply before you pay.
The figure that matters: total cost of funding
The entry price is the number on the banner. The figure that matters is the total cost of funding: the sum of every payment you make between your first click and holding a funded account. That includes the entry fee, any post-pass or activation fee, any per-phase payments, subscription months and the cost of every retry.
Many traders need more than one attempt, so a fair comparison has to look at more than one. Work out the total for one, two and three attempts, then ask which scenario is realistic for you. Our explainer on how the pay-as-you-go model works covers why deferred fees tend to shift cost onto the attempt that passes.
An illustrative worked comparison
The table below is illustrative only. Firm A and Firm B are hypothetical, and the round numbers are not any firm’s real prices.
- Firm A charges a 100 one-off fee per attempt, with nothing further due on passing.
- Firm B charges a 25 entry fee per attempt, plus a 150 activation fee once you pass.
| Scenario (illustrative) | Firm A total | Firm B total |
|---|---|---|
| Pass on attempt 1 | 100 | 25 + 150 = 175 |
| Pass on attempt 2 | 200 | 50 + 150 = 200 |
| Pass on attempt 3 | 300 | 75 + 150 = 225 |
| Fail three times, stop | 300 | 75 |
Firm B looks four times cheaper at the point of sale, yet it costs more if you pass on the first attempt and the same on the second. It only becomes cheaper from the third attempt onwards, or if you never pass. The lesson is not that one structure is better. It is that the answer depends on how many attempts you expect to need, and that the entry price alone tells you very little.
Change the assumptions and the result moves. Add a discounted retry, a shorter payment window or different rules on the deferred plan, and the comparison can flip. Run the numbers for each offer you are considering.
A comparison checklist for any offer
- Every payment, listed. Write down each fee from entry to funded account: entry, per-phase, activation, subscription and any account-issuance charge.
- Retry pricing. Is a second attempt charged at the full entry fee, discounted, or offered as a reset? This drives the multi-attempt total.
- Rule parity. Compare the rule sheet of the deferred plan with the standard plan. Differences in targets, drawdown type or minimum days change your odds. Our guide to static versus trailing drawdown explains why the drawdown model matters.
- Payment window after passing. How long do you have to pay, and when does the clock start?
- Consequence of non-payment. Does a passed evaluation lapse, or can it be held? Is anything credited forward?
- Refund terms. Which fees, if any, are refundable, and on what conditions.
- Payout terms on the funded account. A cheaper route to funding is of little use if the funded terms differ. Read the payout section as carefully as the price. Our overview of how prop firm payouts work lists what to look for.
- Where the terms are published. Rely on the firm’s own published terms, not on summaries, comparison sites or social media. If you are researching a specific firm, verify every figure on its own website.
Applying the method to lower-entry offers
Low entry prices are designed to reduce the cost of trying. That has genuine value if you are uncertain about a firm’s platform or rules and want to test them with limited outlay. It has less value if you are confident and expect to pass quickly, because you will likely pay the larger post-pass fee on your first attempt. Our article on the low upfront fee prop firm challenge looks at that trade-off in more detail.
Be honest about your own record. If you have not yet passed an evaluation, assume more than one attempt in your calculations.
FOREXIVE’s upfront prices, for comparison
FOREXIVE Access is our lower upfront entry route: $10 to start on the 1-Step structure, or $5 on the 2-Step structure, with the rest settled after you pass, per the Access terms. Our standard one-off prices are below.
| Account size | 1-Step | 2-Step |
|---|---|---|
| $5K | $39 | $29 |
| $10K | $59 | $49 |
| $25K | $109 | $99 |
| $50K | $209 | $189 |
| $100K | $319 | $299 |
| $200K | $599 | $549 |
The 1-Step has a single evaluation phase; the 2-Step has two phases and a lower entry price. Rules and payout terms are published with each plan and are authoritative. Apply the same total-cost method to our routes as to anyone else’s.
Frequently asked questions
Is the cheapest entry fee the best deal?
Not necessarily. Add every payment to a funded account across a realistic number of attempts. A low entry fee paired with a large post-pass fee can cost more overall.
How many attempts should I assume?
Base it on your own history. If you have not passed an evaluation before, model at least two or three attempts.
Where should I check a firm’s prices and rules?
On that firm’s own published terms. Prices and rules change, and third-party summaries can be out of date.
Trading involves risk. FOREXIVE evaluations use simulated accounts, most traders do not pass, and nothing in this article is investment advice or a promise of funding or payouts.